<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>[Giagnocavo]Michael::Write() - Photography</title>
    <link>http://www.atrevido.net/blog/</link>
    <description>Something about .NET.</description>
    <copyright>Michael Giagnocavo</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 02:01:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.3.9074.18820</generator>
    <managingEditor>mggUNSPAM@telefinity.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>mggUNSPAM@telefinity.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.atrevido.net/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=231899fb-7862-48f8-b54b-e3a62466aaa6</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.atrevido.net/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.atrevido.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,231899fb-7862-48f8-b54b-e3a62466aaa6.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.atrevido.net/blog/CommentView,guid,231899fb-7862-48f8-b54b-e3a62466aaa6.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.atrevido.net/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=231899fb-7862-48f8-b54b-e3a62466aaa6</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Having just got a dSLR (Nikon D50, rather low-end) with the cheap kit-lens (some Quantaray
lens), I had been looking for a better lens. Most of the photos I take are inside,
mainly snapshots. I've never seen flash photos that look that great, so I prefer to
use the existing light. Of course, indoors, this makes for some really nasty blur
in most cases. There's just not enough light inside my house to be able to get a fast
enough shutter speed.<br /><br />
I read some reviews about the Nikon VR (<a href="http://www.nikon.co.jp/main/eng/portfolio/about/technology/nikon_technology/vr_e/index.htm">Vibration
Reduction</a>) lenses, and that they supposedly compensate for 3 full stops.
I tried one VR lens out in a store, and it seemed pretty interesting, so I ordered
the Nikkor 18-200 VR. Unfortunately, Nikon apparently doesn't know anything about
logistics or manufacturing, and this lens is backordered 2-6 months (depending on
who you ask). Since I don't want to be taking crappy shots for that long, I grabbed
the Nikkor 24-120 VR as a temporary lens. Well, I'm not sure it'll help my crappy
shots, but at least they won't be blurry.<br /><br />
I got home, it's dusk, and decided to try it out. For fun, I set the exposure to 1
second, and well, let the results speak for themselves:<br /><br /><br />
VR Off:<br /><img src="http://www.atrevido.net/blog/content/binary/Cup VR Off.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br />
VR On:<br /><img src="http://www.atrevido.net/blog/content/binary/Cup VR On.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br />
Ignore the actual value of the image (I'm not a photographer), but just look at the
blur. Granted, I was lying against a sofa, so I had a bit of something to lean on,
but the difference with VR on == wow! So, given a bit of support, I can take pictures,
handheld, with exposures &gt; 1/15, no problem. Worth every dollar. 
<br /><br />
Yes, I know this is nothing new, but I'm so impressed I wanted to write it down (also
helps my rationalization on buying the lens :)).
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.atrevido.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=231899fb-7862-48f8-b54b-e3a62466aaa6" />
      </body>
      <title>Wow, Nikon's VR is as good as they say</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atrevido.net/blog/PermaLink,guid,231899fb-7862-48f8-b54b-e3a62466aaa6.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.atrevido.net/blog/2006/08/08/Wow+Nikons+VR+Is+As+Good+As+They+Say.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 02:01:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Having just got a dSLR (Nikon D50, rather low-end) with the cheap kit-lens (some Quantaray
lens), I had been looking for a better lens. Most of the photos I take are inside,
mainly snapshots. I've never seen flash photos that look that great, so I prefer to
use the existing light. Of course, indoors, this makes for some really nasty blur
in most cases. There's just not enough light inside my house to be able to get a fast
enough shutter speed.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I read some reviews about the Nikon VR (&lt;a href="http://www.nikon.co.jp/main/eng/portfolio/about/technology/nikon_technology/vr_e/index.htm"&gt;Vibration
Reduction&lt;/a&gt;)&amp;nbsp;lenses, and that they supposedly compensate for 3 full stops.
I tried one VR lens out in a store, and it seemed pretty interesting, so I ordered
the Nikkor 18-200 VR. Unfortunately, Nikon apparently doesn't know anything about
logistics or manufacturing, and this lens is backordered 2-6 months (depending on
who you ask). Since I don't want to be taking crappy shots for that long, I grabbed
the Nikkor 24-120 VR as a temporary lens. Well, I'm not sure it'll help my crappy
shots, but at least they won't be blurry.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I got home, it's dusk, and decided to try it out. For fun, I set the exposure to 1
second, and well, let the results speak for themselves:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
VR Off:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.atrevido.net/blog/content/binary/Cup VR Off.jpg" border=0&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
VR On:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.atrevido.net/blog/content/binary/Cup VR On.jpg" border=0&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Ignore the actual value of the image (I'm not a photographer), but just look at the
blur. Granted, I was lying against a sofa, so I had a bit of something to lean on,
but the difference with VR on == wow! So, given a bit of support, I can take pictures,
handheld, with exposures &amp;gt; 1/15, no problem. Worth every dollar. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Yes, I know this is nothing new, but I'm so impressed I wanted to write it down (also
helps my rationalization on buying the lens :)).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.atrevido.net/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=231899fb-7862-48f8-b54b-e3a62466aaa6" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.atrevido.net/blog/CommentView,guid,231899fb-7862-48f8-b54b-e3a62466aaa6.aspx</comments>
      <category>Photography</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>