Logo




Subscribe:
RSS 2.0 | Atom 1.0
Categories:

Sign In


[Giagnocavo]Michael::Write()

# Thursday, December 30, 2004
Grinding halt: VS 2005 + Mono + ASP.NET

Well, I guess my cross-platform development bliss had to come to an end sooner or later, right? I started work on a new app for Asterisk, and found that ASP.NET would come in handy.

Visual Studio 2003 requires IIS to work with web projects. Maybe I can trick it into using XSP, but I'm really, very, happy with VS 2005, and I don't want to go back. So, what are the problems with 2005? ASP.NET's new drug-induced compilation model.

Before, I could build my app with codebehind, compile, and go on my merry way. The DLLs are loaded at runtime, things are good, and most importantly, they work with Mono/XSP. Now, I've got several problems. First, it doesn't seem like the ASP.NET 2 support is in Mono. That's fine, I'll stay away from master pages (even though it hurts), and other new stuff. My biggest goal is to use VS 2005.

Then comes the real problems: There is no more “compile“ option in VS 2005 for web projects. Nope. Seems like the ASP/VBS and PHP whiners got their way and wanted things more like a scripting language. Some huge advancements were made (no more stupid IIS screwups). But I can no longer work as before. Which means I can't deploy as before. There's a precompilation system, but it's not what I want.

I can't even do it with runtime compilation either, because of this partial class and “compiles with“ nonsense. So it appears as if I'm screwed. Anyone have any suggestions?

Code
Thursday, December 30, 2004 12:30:26 AM UTC  #    Comments [2]  |  Trackback Tracked by:
"http://coppohq.biz/iss-naked-eye-visibility.html" (http://coppohq.biz/iss-naked... [Pingback]
"http://viuqnvu.biz/nude-virgins.html" (http://viuqnvu.biz/nude-virgins.html) [Pingback]


Wednesday, January 12, 2005 11:23:13 PM UTC
Michael, can you maybe set up the project in VS 2003 and then move it? I haven't recently played with VS 2005 but if you manually create a page and add the CodeBehind tags and create a separate class, wouldn't that still work? I know it did a few revs back in the spring.

If what you say is true that there is really no option at all to compile, that really SUCKS! This would mean that ASP.NET projects no longer are real VS.NET projects at all which would be lame beyond description.

If worse comes to worse I suppose you could add a secondary project put the codebehind there and compile it there. But that's ridiculous.
Wednesday, January 12, 2005 11:44:59 PM UTC
"This would mean that ASP.NET projects no longer are real VS.NET projects at all which would be lame beyond description." <-- THATS TRUE! There's no project. It's just a folder. No project file at all.

I'm going to try moving a project over, and see what happens. I believe I did that once, and it pretty much sucked though.
OpenID
Please login with either your OpenID above, or your details below.
Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):

Live Comment Preview