|
|
|
|
 Tuesday, July 26, 2005
|
I usually wouldn't comment on these things; indeed, I usually don't know anything about sports. But today I saw a newspaper, and on the front page was Lance Armstrong, winning that race in France, again. Apparently he had cancer and is still winning.
At any rate, what I really enjoyed was the look on the face of the race administrator, or whoever was handing him the award. Everyone else is smiling, but the one guy (I guess he's the French Tour administrator?) is just scowling, like “oh damn, he did it again”. I'm sure if I read french, I'd get a kick out of the newspaper articles there... BTW, my friend made some T-shirts up for the occasion: “Lance Armstrong, Survivor Champ!”. Although, if I was designing the shirts, they'd say something like “Tour de Lance” or “Invasion of France”...
|
|
Misc
|
Tuesday, July 26, 2005 6:21:09 PM UTC
|
Trackback
|
 Friday, July 22, 2005
|
VISTA == Vista IS a Terrible Acronym. Actually, having it all caps would be cooler. Really, “Windows Sight“? Or “Windows View“? That's so lame it's not even punny. Even “Windows V6” would be an improvement.
Or perhaps they moved the letters of “ATI Stock Value“ around a bit?
Seriously, with all the money they've invested, couldn't they have come up with a better name? Just think of the conversations -- “Are you running Vista?”, “Vista's preinstalled.”, “This won't work on Vista.” “I can't see the Vista boot screen.“ I'm terrified at what horrible marketing campaign might come off of this. (Dinosaurs not being able to see over a horizon or something...) Actually, Vista could be a very cool name, for like the accessibility features, or some small visualization program (perhaps a photo management applet), but not for the OS. Will we have “Vista Server [2008]“? “Visual Studio Vista“ (shudders). This is especially disappointing with such interesting codenames (Avalon, Indigo).
It's got no level of coolness (XP has an X in it, and that automatically makes it hip). Worst name since Windows 95. I'm pretty convinced that within about 20 hours, someone could write a program to pick names for Longhorn that'd be better than “Vista” at least 50% of the time.
Well, at least the product is going to be amazing. And more importantly, VS2005 remains impressive, and from the bit I know of Orcas, that'll be excellent too. Just makes you wonder what's up at MS when they can't even name their biggest product of the decade...
|
|
Misc
|
Friday, July 22, 2005 5:05:01 PM UTC
|
Trackback
|
 Tuesday, February 01, 2005
|
CNN has a story about american high school kids who don't know what free speech is. (Thanks BoingBoing!)
Wow. Double wow. Are kids really this clueless? Are they really such idiotic sheep? Through an intense, multi-year study* that I've done, I know that many kids are idiots. But now they're just gonna go and screw themselves over? Maybe these kids LIKE CSS and Region Encoding? Perhaps the MPAA are visionaries and are actually marketing to these people?
Sigh... I'm frightened by the attitude and lack of critical thinking I see in most adults in the states these days. I'm surprised that most americans do not know what made their idea of government any good. Here's a hint: It's not poor cars and bad food. The USA started out as a good idea because it had a government that was built to limit itself. These days, people just think it's about capitalism, immoral behaviour, and whatever other base thing that comes to mind.
The thought of these children growing up, and from an early age thinking that the government HAS or SHOULD HAVE more power... that's simply chilling.
|
|
Misc | Security
|
Tuesday, February 01, 2005 2:56:20 AM UTC
|
Trackback
|
 Sunday, December 05, 2004
Get ready to subscribe to the coolest new blog. Yep, the Royal Chat Queen, the most powerful woman in chat business, Jana Tsering Neve' "Don't ASL Me" Carter herself is blogging: Jana Carter. Everyone on Earth[1] had been asking her to start a blog for many years, but I guess it took MSN Spaces to finally convince her. For those of you who don't know who Jana Carter is, she's a PM at MSFT. More specifically, she's responsible for the cool new Chat 2.0 client that MSDN and others use. She is the one that liberated us from MSN Chat and it's evil ActiveX control.
[1] Actually, I don't have any data on how many people asked her to start a blog. So I asked a few things in the room, discarded null answers (the teapot refused to answer) and extrapolated the results.
|
|
Misc
|
Sunday, December 05, 2004 4:23:08 AM UTC
|
Trackback
|
 Thursday, November 25, 2004
|
Mr. F. Morales left an interesting [read: lame] comment on my post about MPAA/security stupidity down here in Guatemala (at the Miraflores / Cinepolis mall). The mall *banned* all cameras and recording equipment, and actually goes around enforcing this. (Although, this isn't any different than Disney does these days in the states.) Basically, he swears at me and tells me to put up with stupidity or get out of the country. I replied to him already, so we'll leave that alone.
What he did remind me of was a time I met another overzealous "Defender of the Republic". I was once driving home, only to find that some people had decided to park all over the road, completely blocking it off. They were all inside some little party; they weren't even thinking of moving their cars. We waited a few minutes.
Then I got out and found whoever was around there and asked them why they were such morons by parking their vehicles there, and if I should move them or if they were going to take care of it. I got a long flaming response about how I shouldn't insult people just cause they're from another country and things aren't as good as they are in the USA.
I started choking from laughter. I nicely explained to the person that being an idiot is a trans-gender, trans-racial, and international designation. I don't care if this guy is from Guatemala, Canada, Zimbabwe or Manchuria. If you park your car in the road blocking me from getting home without any reason besides laziness, I'll yell at you. Some people are so insecure or sensitive about their <whatever> (be it their OS, database engine (MySQL anyone? :)), religion, or country). Sometimes, just *sometimes*, it helps to think a bit before you get annoyed about a particular bit of criticism.
|
|
Guatemala | Misc
|
Thursday, November 25, 2004 3:43:08 AM UTC
|
Trackback
|
 Tuesday, November 16, 2004
|
Digital Rights Management has been and will continue to be a hot topic for a while. On the one end we have the MPAA and the RIAA who are stuck in the early 1900s, and intelligent consumers. In the middle, we have people like Microsoft, who have to try to satisfy both ends of the scale. Then, there's some lesser companies that make DRM (like MacroVision) who even beyond the MPAA and RIAA, in the sense that they try to propogate the need for their useless technology.
Why is DRM bad? Because it hurts the customer. It takes the flexibility and usefulness of a technology away. It's anti-innovation. No one wakes up in the morning and says “Hmm, I'd like to pay money to do less than I can do for free.” That's exactly what DRM does for consumers.
Some people defend DRM, saying that if there was no DRM, then people would copy things left and right and collapse their industry. Apparently these people have never heard of eMule or Kazaa. Crackers and pirates are going to bypass whatever system you have installed anyways. Except for simple protections (say, an easy-to-use activation system that doesn't require an Internet connection), putting extra runtime checks in that interefere with operation makes things worse for your customers.
This doesn't mean you shouldn't encrypt your binaries or run them through an obfuscator. It means you shouldn't have software that polls in the background for debuggers that might be running, or secret checks on the CD to ensure it is legitimate.
For instance, take my post about stupid copy protection like SafeDisc: Here, a legit customer is suffering from the stupidity imposed by the corporation: You MUST SafeDisc all releases. In fact, me, a legitimate customer, had to turn to getting a pirate crack to be able to use the software I purchased. Had I pirated it to begin with, I'd have never run into trouble. In fact, check that link out, and look at all the search referrals. A LOT of people are having the same problems. The solution? Don't pay, just get a crack. Again, DRM messing things up.
Same thing for some of those dongle-based protection systems. If the software is worth it, it'll get cracked. However, legit customers don't get a crack. So, when their dongle fails, they get rather annoyed. Ask some Autodesk/discreet customers about that, and I'm sure you'll hear some great stories. Nothing like shelling out $$$$$ to get a top-of-the-line system, only to have your software say “Hey, you don't have a dongle. Theif! Call and buy our software!” a day before deadlines.
So, besides pissing customers off, does it hurt companies? Well, yes, and quite directly. An average user, say, someone with an Autodesk product, might not go into cracks, thinking every crack download has a virus and whatnot. They might not want to/care to/be able to install them. However, when the company FORCES the customer to figure it out (i.e., to meet your deadline, or to copy some music in time for a party, or to just bloody use the software you paid for), that customer now KNOWS how to work the pirate scene. The customer sees that well, no, cracks down erase your hard disk and delete your work while infecting every machine on the network with a virus. In fact, in some cases, things might work even better (like a SafeDisc game that pauses the game every few minutes to search for the CD).
Now what? Well, you've taken an innocent customer, and forced him into piracy once. Next time he needs 1 more license, he's got one less reason to purchase it. Next time there's a choice between running down and buying a DVD, or downloading a rip from the net (and avoiding region issues), there's less incentive to buy. “Average Joe” customers who would never have used a crack before (even if they wanted to), now might go ahead and do that. And recommend/show to their “Average Jane” friends.
And unlike earlier MacroVision stuff that protected analog tapes (ever try to copy a rental to VHS?) that required small $10 hardware cleaners to fix, things in the digital domain and on the Internet don't require any special hardware. Installing a crack can be as easy as 3 clicks. Deprotecting content can be done with a single click. Hell, Windows even asks me to decrypt DVDs when inserted in the drive -- no clicks required if I so desired!
I wonder how long it'll take people holding IP to realise that working WITH their customers instead of treating everyone like the devil will help them. It seems pretty obvious to me and everyone I've talked to. I wonder why it's so hard for them?
|
|
Misc | Security
|
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 2:30:31 AM UTC
|
Trackback
|
 Thursday, August 05, 2004
 Thursday, March 11, 2004
|
Well, I'm moving to Atlanta tomorrow (with a few day stop in Miami). It's rather sudden (only decided about 2 weeks ago). As I try to pack up everything I have, I'm amazed at how much stuff I have that's just sitting around. I'm destroying ~500 CD-ROMs and DVDs (old backups, beta CDs, etc.). I've noticed that MSDN contributes quite a bit to this (because MSDN Latin America refuses to send just English, but insists on sending all sorts of localized versions that I'm never going to use (because I have MUIs!)).
On the other hand, there aren't that many things I'm taking (a few suitcases is all of my stuff). Apart from my CPU case, the largest thing I have is my Go board. Makes me wonder why I keep so many things lying around.
Anyways, does anyone have any hints for a .NET MVP getting into Atlanta? I'm looking for apartments (2BR) in Midtown... we'll see how that goes. If any other .NET people are interesting meeting up sometime for a drink, let me know. I hope there's a good local user group in Atlanta...
(Yes, because of this I won't be posting anything substantial for a bit.)
|
|
Misc | Personal
|
Thursday, March 11, 2004 7:10:36 PM UTC
|
Trackback
|
 Monday, March 08, 2004
|
|