Sometimes people talk of diversity as if striving for the utmost diversity is somehow going to bring a huge benefit. Somehow, the “higher” the diversity, the “better” things get. Sure, there's obviously some value into having different points of view, different methods, etc. And perhaps, more times than not, valuable information is not discovered because of too closed a point of view. OTOH, extreme diversity is not a boon. It's incompatibility.Every now and then, I'll read about how Guatemala is so culturally rich because there's 20+ dialects of the Mayan language. I've seen a lot of people say this is a beautiful, positive thing. Yes, some people actually try to justify 20+ mutually intelligible dialects in a small country as a GOOD thing. Of course, most of the times they don't actually know any of the languages.In fact, it gets taken even further. The government down here pushes “bilingual” education. At first, I thought that was great -- teach the kids Spanish and English so they'll have valuable skills. Nope. Instead, they're teaching math in Mayan. Thus, they'll have a hard time finding better jobs, working with society, etc. In fact, some of the indigenous people in the villages where my parents work think that their kids are being taught this on purpose to keep them back. I.e., they *want* to learn in Spanish (and other popular languages), since they know it'll help them. So, this kind of thinking does indeed limit them from getting ahead. I suppose proponents will take pride in noting that their “culturally rich”. Sigh.
Remember Me